| Choosing the top states to market your products in | | | | median family income is a factor, but just one of |
| is the sign of an advanced insurance marketing | | | | many issues that are analyzed. The Northeastern and |
| organization. There is a clear realization among the | | | | New England states often enjoy a much higher |
| best marketers that many factors are involved in | | | | average family income, but that presents itself as a |
| determining a state's insurance product market ability. | | | | minor aspect with insurance agents. View how few |
| Here are the states ranked in order. View a previous | | | | of these states are listed among the top half. |
| report on how 30 steps are engaged to calculate | | | | RANKING FOR MARKETING INSURANCE PRODUCTS |
| where one state relates in a positional ranking to | | | | 1. Florida |
| another. | | | | 2. California |
| Recruiting agents in one state to sell your product | | | | 3. Texas |
| may be a breeze while in another it could be a | | | | 4. Ohio |
| financial nightmare. The margin of response is very | | | | 5. Georgia |
| vast. So vast, that spending the same amount of | | | | 6. Wisconsin |
| money an insurance marketing recruiting campaign in | | | | 7. Minnesota |
| one state, produces double the results of another. | | | | 8. North Carolina |
| Why not start with the states consistently producing | | | | 9. Michigan |
| for most wise marketers good productive replies and | | | | 10. Missouri |
| product sales production exceeding normal | | | | 11. Tennessee |
| expectations? | | | | 12. Oregon |
| This wisdom applies both to selecting agents and to | | | | 13. Alabama |
| insurance recruiting in individual states to give you a | | | | 14. Kentucky |
| state-by-state analysis of insurance recruiting and | | | | 15. Arkansas |
| insurance agent marketing. Using the combined | | | | 16. Kansas |
| knowledge allows you to plan your insurance | | | | 17. Mississippi |
| recruiting campaign on smart insurance agent | | | | 18. Oklahoma |
| marketing information. You will be shown from the | | | | 19. Nebraska |
| top down to the very bottom, the guideline ranking | | | | 20. Utah |
| best states for marketing insurance successfully. | | | | 21 New Mexico |
| This means that it you have a national territory, what | | | | 22 West Virginia |
| do you do. It does not mean recommending that you | | | | 23. North Dakota |
| send a proportionate amount of marketing sales | | | | 24. Montana |
| pieces to agents in each of the states. Smart | | | | 25. Maine |
| marketing can be achieved either of two ways. | | | | 26. Louisiana |
| Spend 80% of your recruiting budget on states | | | | 27. Pennsylvania |
| known to provide great results and 20% on the | | | | 28. Montana |
| others. Here is an option to this. It is better to mail a | | | | 29. Iowa |
| quality list in a good state twice than a bad one once. | | | | 30. Idaho |
| Double mailing the best is a very viable option. Mail | | | | 31. Illinois |
| the best and forget the rest. | | | | 32. Delaware |
| For a successful insurance recruiting campaign, follow | | | | 33. Massachusetts |
| the ranking best states for marketing insurance | | | | 34. South Dakota |
| products recommendations, or take your chances at | | | | 35. New Hampshire |
| hit and miss. This particular state insurance agent | | | | 36. Connecticut |
| marketing information provided to you is not available | | | | 37. Virginia |
| from any insurance recruiting internet or list source. A | | | | 38. Maryland |
| list broker would not want this information published. | | | | 39. Washington |
| It is more beneficial to them to sell you a list of | | | | 40. New Jersey |
| agent names in all states. To a list broker the larger | | | | 41. New York |
| the agent name list you purchase, and the more | | | | 42. Indiana |
| states you order, the bigger their profits become. | | | | 43. Alaska |
| Ask yourself if this is a means of enhancing their | | | | 44. Wyoming |
| profits or your personal profits. | | | | 45. Vermont |
| The distinguishing reasons for why some states tend | | | | 46. Rhode Island |
| to be so more productive will be found in another | | | | 47. Colorado |
| advanced insurance marketing report. Size is not a | | | | 48. Arizona |
| major factor. If it was, Illinois, New York, and | | | | 49. Nevada |
| Pennsylvania would be given a much higher rank. The | | | | 50. |