Learn a Big Lesson From AIG

About 15 years ago, I got a call from a lead partnerDelegation is a good thing; abdication is not a good
at one of the largest executive recruiting firms askingthing. After their leadership change, AIG migrated
if I'd be interested in talking to Mr. Hank Greenburg(maybe leaped is a better word in this case) from
about a senior level job at AIG. That company wasautocracy to democracy, overnight. Executives in
the big dog in property and casualty insurance andfar-flung areas of their business - areas that
was led by an iconic figure (Hank) that took a smallGreenburg controlled with a tight reign - suddenly
insurance company in the 1960s and built it into aassumed more control of their own destiny. They
Fortune 10 in a few decades.began incrementally making riskier decisions - not
The job we discussed was running AIG in the Farbecause they were incompetent or immoral but
East out of Tokyo. I was interested, but after abecause their new "freedom" allowed them to do
couple of months of dancing, we were unable tothat. Their entrepreneurial instincts were no longer
overcome my primary hurdle: I was willing to make atempered by Greenburg's multi-dimensional approach.
three-year commitment to Japan; they wanted five.The most egregious case of that was in derivatives
If you're asking yourself, "Why would someone wanttrading - most notably in credit default swaps.
to go to work for AIG?" my answer is this: The AIGCDFs were created to enable creditors to insure their
that Greenburg built was not the same company thatrisk of default (and boy, is THAT a simplistic
essentially folded under his successor, Martin Sullivan.definition). They were labeled as derivatives rather
Here's what the business press didn't talk about:than insurance to enable companies to sidestep state
Hank Greenburg ran AIG with an iron fist. Someregulation; it worked. Over time at AIG after
associates joked that the company didn't need aGreenburg departed, CDFs were used to cover
strategy; it had Greenburg. Every decision ofincreasingly risky portfolios of mortgages. At the end,
consequence crossed his desk. Autocracy was thesub-prime loans (or worse) represented an
order of the day and at AIG it worked. Although heirresponsible proportion of this business for AIG. If
had begun his career as an attorney and insuranceGreenburg had been there during the two years
guy, Greenburg became both an incredibly successfulbefore it "hit the fan," it wouldn't have hit the fan.
entrepreneur and operator - a rare combination - andBlame Spitzer, not Greenburg, and, oh yes, blame
boy, did he ring the cash register. He could navigateAIG's Board of Directors. Prior to Greenburg's ouster,
between long-term strategy and day-to-daythere was no real succession plan in place and at the
operations with ease. For thirty years, many peopletime of his ouster, there was no one ready to
got wealthy at the company as both its top andassume accountability for his or her diverse cadre of
bottom lines grew at a breathtaking pace. Then, in abusinesses. Sullivan was not prepared to assume the
well-documented act of spite, jealousy, revenge andreigns of this sprawling company. Other than Jamie
political opportunism, Elliot Spitzer, that paragon ofDimon (and even that would probably have been a
propriety, got Greenburg ousted. Martin Sullivanstretch), the right executive for this challenge did not
became the CEO.exist.
Sullivan was a really accomplished insurance guy. HeHere's the lesson: You cannot migrate from one
had successfully run a large number of AIGculture to its direct opposite with a "plug-and-play"
businesses, both domestically and internationally. Heapproach. Changing cultures is not akin to changing
had no experience, however, outside of insurance atthe oil in your car. In this case, all of AIG's executives
a company whose businesses, by the early 1990s,were not equally capable of contextualizing, and then
also included derivatives trading and aircraft leasing. Ifexecuting, decisions with $billion consequences.
Sullivan had taken the reigns twenty years earlier,Cultures are durable. Destabilize them quickly; change
when insurance represented the overwhelming sharethe rules of the game with a "flick of the switch";
of the company's business, it would have been aimpose order on chaos or chaos on order all at once
good fit, but as I'm fond of saying, "That's true...andand you will probably face deadly consequences - the
if I had wheels I'd be a bicycle."loss of your reputation or company. Massive change
Sullivan's style was much more collaborative,must be planned and executed in a precise,
consensual and collegial than his predecessor. Hesystematic way. It doesn't have to drag on for
delegated many more (and much bigger) decisions toyears, but it can't happen overnight. "Transformation"
other executives. "What's wrong with that?" you ask.and "upheaval" are not synonymous.
In this case, plenty.Copyright 2010 Rand Golletz. All rights reserved.
Stay with me!