Opinion Letters on Compensation Paid by Nonprofits

The IRS believes that some officers and otherdonor relations. Many charitable boards need guidance
employees may be taking advantage of theiron pay levels due to the subjective nature of
influential positions by setting their own compensationdetermining reasonable compensation, complex facts
at above-market levels. The IRS has begun aand the desire to avoid IRS scrutiny. An opinion letter
wide-spread initiative to find those overpaidfrom an independent party can give board members
individuals.comfort that pay levels are in line with the market,
The IRS is primarily using Internal Revenue Codereduce turnover, and help avoid the excise taxes by
section 4958, which allows them to impose excisecreating a rebuttable presumption that the
taxes on the excessive portion of compensation paidcompensation is reasonable.
to a charity's employee. These excise taxes areIf the compensation is presumed to be reasonable
referred to as "intermediate sanctions" since they areunder the excess benefit rules, section 4958 excise
less severe than having the IRS revoke the charity'staxes can then be imposed only if the IRS develops
tax-exempt status.sufficient contrary evidence to rebut the charity's
These excise taxes are aimed at unreasonableevidence. In other words, the burden shifts to the
compensation paid to a "disqualified person." AIRS to prove that the compensation was
disqualified person is anyone who was "in a positionunreasonable.
to exercise substantial influence over the affairs" ofThe charity's board must meet three requirements to
the tax-exempt organization at any time during thecreate a rebuttable presumption that compensation is
five-year period prior to the transaction, and thereasonable:
family members of any such person. Note that it is1. The compensation must be approved in advance
not necessary that the person actually exercisedby an independent board or board committee
substantial influence, only that he or she was in awithout the disqualified person participating,
position to do so.2. Appropriate comparability data that documents the
Over-paid independent contractors may be subjectarms' length nature of the transaction, such as
to the excise tax also. This could include CPAs andcompensation surveys, must be relied upon, and
attorneys if they meet the definition of disqualified3. The basis for approval must be documented in
person.writing, such as through board minutes.
The Code refers to the unreasonable portion ofA qualified compensation consultant can help the
compensation as an "excess benefit transaction"board meet these requirements by providing
because the individual is getting a benefitcomparability data and documenting it in an opinion
(compensation) in excess of the value of theletter. In preparing opinion letters, the compensation
services he or she provides for that compensation.professional should take into consideration all relevant
Expect the IRS to look particularly closely atfacts and circumstances including, but not limited to:
compensation amounts paid to: officers who also sit1. Compensation levels paid by similar organizations,
on the charity's Board of Trustees, relatives of majorboth taxable and tax-exempt, for comparable
donors, long-term employees who have cut backpositions;
their hours, employees who receive performance2. The availability of similar employees in the
bonuses, and anyone who has a hand in setting his orgeographic area;
her own compensation level. Certain industries are of3. Current compensation surveys compiled by
special interest to the IRS. For example, hospitalsindependent firms; and
may be examined because market conditions have4. Any written offers from similar employers
pushed their officers' compensation to higher levels incompeting for the services of the disqualified person.
recent years.Other relevant factors usually include the size of the
Under Code section 4958(a)(1), the IRS can impose aorganization, the geographic area it serves, and the
25% excise tax on the unreasonable portion of anqualifications and duties of the employee.
individual's compensation. (This excise tax is in additionThe opinion letters serve another important purpose.
to federal and state income taxes, and FICA tax theReg. 53.4958(d)(4)(iii) provides protection for the
employee has to pay on that compensation.) If theorganization managers against the 10% excise tax
unreasonable portion is not repaid promptly after theeven if the compensation is determined to be
25% tax is imposed, section 4958(b) provides for anunreasonable. To get this protection, the managers
excise tax equal to 200% of the unreasonablemust obtain an opinion letter stating that the
portion.compensation consultant believes that if the
In addition, Code section 4958(a)(2) allows the IRScompensation amount is challenged by the IRS, it
to impose an excise tax on an "organization manager"would "more likely than not" be upheld in court. Other
(officer, director or trustee) who participated inrequirements must be met as well. Although this does
permitting the unreasonable compensation, unlessnot guarantee that the compensation will not be
such participation was not willful and was due tofound to be unreasonable, obtaining and using such an
reasonable cause. This tax is 10% of theopinion letter can protect the officers and board
unreasonable portion of the compensation. It wasmembers from personal exposure to the 10% excise
limited to $10,000 per excess benefit transaction untiltax.
the Pension Protection Act of 2006 raised that limitU.S. Treasury Department Circular 230 requires that
to $20,000. Those organization managers whocertain disclosures be included in the opinion letter.
knowingly allow the excessive compensation areUnder section 10.35(e)(3), the disclosure usually
jointly and severally liable for this excise tax. Ofincludes a statement saying that the letter contains a
course, the last thing any volunteer board member"limited scope opinion" as defined by Circular 230
wants is to be personally exposed to a tax.(Title 31 Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Part
Note that both the 25% and the 10% excise taxes10, revised as of September 26, 2007). The letter
are imposed upon the individuals, not the charity.also includes a statement that the opinions expressed
To let everyone know that they are serious aboutin the letter are limited to the one or more federal
this, the IRS announced that it was proposing overtax issues addressed in the letter, and that additional
$21 million in section 4958 excise taxes on fortyissues may exist that could affect the federal tax
disqualified persons and organization managers attreatment of the transaction or matter that is the
twenty-five charities.subject of the opinions and the opinions do not
In addition to the monetary impact, publicity resultingconsider or provide a conclusion with respect to any
from these penalties can be disastrous for a charity.additional issues; and, with respect to any significant
For all these reasons, charities need to be veryfederal tax issues outside the limited scope of the
careful about how much they pay and how theopinion, the opinion was not written and cannot be
amounts are determined. But, setting levels ofused for the purpose of avoiding penalties.
compensation for key employees is difficult forThe opinion letter should also include a statement of
charitable Boards of Trustees since most boardindependence from the compensation professional.
members are not familiar with the complexities ofThis article provides an overview of the complex
compensation analysis. And, determining appropriaterules governing compensation paid by charities. With
cash compensation levels for key employees at aemphasis on corporate governance now at an all-time
charity may be more challenging than doing so athigh, advisors and board members should become
for-profit companies since charities do not offerfamiliar with these rules and carefully monitor the
stock options, profit-sharing plans and some of thecompensation and benefits of employees and
other incentives rewarded to executives at for-profitcontractors. The steps taken by a charity to avoid
entities. Yet pay levels and benefits at charitablethe excess benefit transaction excise taxes can also
organizations must keep up with the market tobe useful in an audit by a state regulatory agency,
prevent turnover, since turnover among keyand in responding to inquiries from potential donors.
employees is costly, disruptive, and damaging to