Why We Should Put the Trainer Back Into Sales Management

Up until 20 years ago, a key function of a salesimperative to help sales people keep up to date and
manager's role was the regular training of their saleseffective. Training needs to be regular for it to have
people. What did this look like? Well, something likeany effect. Regular 'mini' training sessions in short,
this: weekly 1 hour power training sessions for thesharp bursts combined with one-on-one coaching in
sales team focusing on honing key skills, bi-monthlythe field makes for better and better sales
half day or 1 day sessions drilling down on accountperformance as well as team spirit, unity and
planning, strategy, market and product knowledge,retention. But when do sales managers have the time
and formal class room training usually employingto learn how to be good trainers and coaches? And
external, expert training providers on a once or twicewhen do they have the time to put this into
yearly basis to boost their teams to the next level.practice?
This was all supplemented by sales meetings andSince 1997, we have been accrediting and training
one-on-one coaching.sales managers at Barrett to be competent trainers
Many sales managers of yesteryear were goodand coaches. Many report very positive outcomes as
trainers. However, through my observations acrossa result of being able to conduct regular training with
many businesses, the training component has beentheir teams. Besides sales lifting, team moral
replaced by compliance. Caught in a bind of having toimproves, there is better retention of staff, and
meet their reporting and meeting obligations, salesclients seem happier too.
managers lose valuable time that should be investedIt has been shown that if a business has skillful,
in the continuous development of their sales people.professionally trained sales managers who can
I am seeing that many sales managers are nowstrategise and plan; lead, coach and train; effectively
relegated to being 'CRM compliance police', caught upmanage their unit; liaise, link and collaborate with other
in reporting on numbers of leads, meetings,divisions; and regularly report relevant, real data to
conversions, etc., usually at the behest of seniorthe business, then the performance of the sales
management to justify their investment in a CRM.team will improve significantly. No other area of
This means that sales people are often left to fenddevelopment shows such a positive correlation with
for themselves with no sales management support atsales results.
all and often feel under constant scrutiny to meetAs a rule of thumb, 'best practice' states a sales
their numbers quotas.manager should invest their time accordingly:
I get constant complaints from sales managers about- 60-70% in people development (including coaching,
this 'numbers' obsession and they not being able totraining, performance management, recruiting,
support and develop their people to be their best.succession planning and sales meetings)
They know numbers are important but numbers are- 25%-30% in strategising, business planning, future
not the only aspect of effective sales performance -thinking, etc.
yet why are they required to worship at the- 5-15% in reporting and administration
compliance alter?This is a plea on behalf of beleaguered sales mangers
Training sales people is vital to healthy and sustainableeverywhere - if you want great sales results, get
sales performance. With markets becoming moreyour sales managers training again.
complex and changing at rapid rates, regular training isRemember everybody lives by selling something.